Trends and Transformations in Copyright & Trademark

Recent Blog Posts

  1. Translating IP Translator For US Mark Holders Filing in Europe

    Translating IP Translator For US Mark Holders Filing in Europe

    I recently moderated a table topics discussion at the INTA annual meeting in Dallas on alternatives available to US mark holders when registering their marks in Europe. One of the issues that came up was the case of Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys v. The Registrar of Trademarks known as IP Translator (decision here). The case continues to cause problems for Community Trademark fillers seeking a community trademark (CTM) in the European Union (EU).

    Read more

  2. The Art of the Deal: How to Draft and Negotiate an IP Deal; Part I

    The Art of the Deal: How to Draft and Negotiate an IP Deal; Part I

     
     
    I recently spoke at a CLE at my firm about how to successfully draft key provisions in an intellectual property license and negotiate them. Here is an edited transcript that I post in two pieces. In this first one I offer suggestions about drafting warranties, indemnities and limitations of liability and I also provider some drafting tips.

    Read more

  3. Oral Argument in the Second Circuit in Aereo Suggests that a Reversal Is in the Offing

    Oral Argument in the Second Circuit in Aereo Suggests that a Reversal Is in the Offing


    The oral argument in WNET et al. v. Aereo before the 2d Circuit panel of Judges Denny Chin and Christopher Droney and Eastern District Judge John Gleeson was long (more than 45 minutes) and spirited. The transcript is here. But the panel’s questions suggest the court may reverse and find that Aereo’s online transmission of live TV performances is an unlicensed public performance violating the Copyright Act.

    Read more

  4. Will Aereo’s Internet Streaming Service Survive Second Circuit Review?

    Will Aereo’s Internet Streaming Service Survive Second Circuit Review?


    Innovation breeds copyright litigation. The scenario is often the same. The copyright holder whose market share is eroded by the innovative product claims it infringes its statutory-protected rights. The technologist responds that its innovation is simply another authorized improvement in an evolutionary chain that benefits the public. These arguments are at play in ABC et al. v. Aereo and WNET v.

    Read more

SUBSCRIBE TO THE BLOG


Recent Twitter Posts